Rahul Gandhi – A “Pappu” or “Thinker”

Rahul’s US trip triggers uproar

Sam Pitroda (SP), Chairman of the Indian Overseas Congress and a close mentor to Rahul Gandhi, recently asserted, “I must tell you; he is not ‘Pappu‘. He is highly educated, a strategist with deep thinking on any subject.” Ironically, while attempting to defend Rahul Gandhi, Pitroda inadvertently reinforces the very label he sought to dismiss by referencing the derogatory moniker ‘Pappu.’ This attempt to salvage RaGa’s image, especially after arranging his U.S. tour, is filled with contradictions.

The visit, promoted by SP, was not only about showcasing Rahul Gandhi as a leader but also about aligning with individuals and groups whose views oppose the idea of a united and strong Bharat. Among the controversial figures he met were supporters of Khalistan, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar from Minnesota—a known critic of Indian policies—and other anti-Hindu and anti-India voices. Pitroda ensured that Rahul’s vision, which has been interpreted by some as divisive, resonated with those whose interests lie in fracturing India’s social and political fabric.

Gandhi’s tour, his first since becoming the Leader of the Opposition in Bharat’s Parliament, was meant to address his longstanding image as ‘Pappu’—a label used to denote incompetence. His schedule included meetings with intellectuals, members of academia, media personnel, and the Indian diaspora. However, instead of dispelling the ‘Pappu’ image, his actions and interactions appeared to reinforce it. Sam Pitroda’s portrayal of Rahul as a ‘deep thinker’ seems more like an attempt to maintain his own influence rather than an objective assessment of Rahul’s capabilities. Calling Rahul Gandhi a visionary disrespects those who genuinely possess political foresight.

Despite Congress doubling its seats in the 2019 elections, Rahul Gandhi’s political journey has been marred by blunders. His fixation on unseating Prime Minister Narendra Modi has escalated into a series of missteps. One particularly controversial was his claim that Sikhs in Bharat are prohibited from wearing turbans, kadas, and from visiting gurdwaras. This unfounded and blatant assertion appeared to be aimed at gaining the favor of pro-Khalistan factions but deeply insulted the Sikh community in India. In reality, India is home to one of the world’s most vibrant Sikh populations, and religious freedom for Sikhs is protected under Indian law.

Another miscalculation was Rahul’s engagement with Ilhan Omar, a U.S. Congresswoman with a checkered background and a history of anti-India rhetoric. Omar, known for her visit to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and support for controversial positions on Kashmir, introduced a bill on Islamophobia and has advocated policies that disadvantage Indians waiting for U.S. green cards. Her anti-India stance is well-documented, yet RaGa stood next to her, in what many see as an act of naïveté. It is difficult to comprehend how a proclaimed ‘deep thinker’ like RaGa could not foresee the negative response this would evoke in India.

One of Rahul’s most damaging statements was his declaration that India is not a nation but merely a collection of states. No other political leader has so publicly undermined their own country on foreign soil. Criticizing government policies is one thing, but belittling one’s homeland on a global platform crosses a line. This incident reinforced his ‘Pappu’ persona more than any other.

Further adding to his missteps, RaGa, in his Pappu style, questioned the credibility of India’s democratic institutions, including the Election Commission and the judiciary. While critiques of government actions are a regular part of political discourse, his claim that the ruling BJP has “captured all institutions” and is intent on “destroying the Constitution” appeared hyperbolic and unfounded. Ironically, Rahul failed to acknowledge that his own grandmother, Indira Gandhi, once imposed the Emergency, which suspended India’s democratic processes.

Rahul Gandhi is also credited with bringing together multiple opposition parties to form the I.N.D.I.A. (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance) coalition to challenge Narendra Modi. However, during his U.S. trip, it became evident that Rahul might not have been the creative mind behind this acronym. When asked by a reporter what the final ‘A’ in I.N.D.I.A. stood for, Rahul struggled to recall that it stood for ‘Alliance,’ a moment that further solidified his ‘Pappu’ label.

Is it possible that Rahul Gandhi could become India’s Prime Minister? It seems highly unlikely. However, should he hold such aspirations, the country in question should not be Bharat. RaGa might be more successful with his ideas in a nation like Pakistan, where his viewpoints may align more closely.

In summary, Rahul Gandhi’s recent U.S. tour did not dispel his image as ‘Pappu’; rather it solidified it further. Far from being a deep thinker or visionary, his actions suggest he is disconnected from the realities of the nation he falsely dreams of leading. Instead of reinforcing his leadership, the trip further exposed his tendency to align with forces that seek to undermine Bharat.

Note:
1. Text in Blue points to additional data on the topic.
2. The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of PGurus.

For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.

The post Rahul Gandhi – A “Pappu” or “Thinker” appeared first on PGurus.